Looks like Shimano's new Dura Ace carbon wheels were on display this past weekend (on top of a Team Sky support car.) These look like 60mm rims to me, but they could be 78mm depending on the perspective.
Interestingly, it appears these wheels are set up for 10 speed, so they probably didn't go on the bikes that have been testing the new 11 speed Dura Ace 9000.
Photos after the jump:
As I talked about in my previous post about the new 11 speed Dura Ace group, there has been some wholesale redesign of the group. Some new photos (actually scans, it appears) have surfaced, giving some more depth and detail to the group.
First up, the rear derailleur:
From what we see here, it looks like they've redesigned the P-Knuckle a little bit and stylized the outer parallelogram pieces to look more “swoopy.” The barrel adjuster also appears revised, and looks to be metal (could be glossy plastic, but aluminum would be nicer.) The cage shape looks a little more angular with more material on the bottom of the cage. Overall it doesn't look too bad, and I'm sure it will be typically smooth, Shimano trademark operation.
More photos after the jump:
So many cyclists rely on Garmin units to direct them in their riding these days; gone are the days of consulting a paper map and cue sheet. Not to mention that getting lost and asking for directions is basically a thing of the past. No, now we can sit in the comfort of our own living room and plan a 50 mile ride, but with the myriad options out there, which one do you choose? This go around, we'll have a look at RideWithGPS.com and explore some of it's features.
I'm all for self expression, and I'm all for people riding their bikes. If people need some kind of eccentric bike to motivate them to get out and pedal, then good for them.
Sometimes though, the power of the internet drops something into our lap that defies convention and circumvents all common sense.
The “FacePalm Files” chronicles these tales.
[dc]S[/dc]ince my previous post apparently stirred up a bit of controversy, I think it's appropriate to address the following question:
"Why didn't you include triple cranksets in your comparisons?"
Well, the simple explanation is because triples are irrelevant.
"What?"
Yes, they're irrelevant. With the rise of compact gearing and wide range cassettes, triple cranksets have been relegated to the dustbin of cycling history (with the notable exceptions of loaded touring and possible commuters.) But the question remains, why is this the case? Let's find out.